Legal Opinion

In Re Wigoda

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1979No. 51657PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

Pursuant to Rule 753(e) (65 Ill. 2d R. 753), the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission has been granted leave by us to file exceptions to the report and recommendation (with a dissent) of the Review Board, which affirmed the Hearing Board’s recommendation that the respondent, Paul T. Wigoda, a former alderman in the city council of Chicago, be reinstated to the Illinois bar. Also pursuant to Rule 753(e), we allowed the Administrator and respondent to file briefs and orally argue. There is no dispute of facts. A chronology of occurrences is necessary, however.

On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. In Re SaladinoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re MitanIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re BossovIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re ThebusIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re: BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API