Legal Opinion

Fountain Village Development Co. v. Multnomah County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 22, 2001No. 2000-051; A112829PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioner, Fountain Village Development Company, petitions for review of a final opinion and order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), determining that Fountain Village had lost an alleged vested right to complete and use a log cabin on land zoned for commercial forest use. Respondent, cross-petitioner Multnomah County, does not challenge LUBA’s determination of the vested rights issue but, by way of a “conditional cross-petition,” asserts that if we reverse or modify LUBA’s decision, we should direct LUBA to determine certain additional matters. We reverse and remand on the petition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Eklund v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Forman v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Twin Rocks Watseco Defense Committee v. SheetsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Or. Shores Conservation Coal. v. Bd. of Commissioners of Clatsop Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Sizemore v. Town of Chesapeake BeachCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Central Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Central Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Crosley v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API