Moran v. Shern
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
One issue is dispositive of this appeal: Did the trial court err in concluding that the agreement was unambiguous and in its construction of that agreement favorable to the Morans ?
Appellants, Shems, contend that the trial court erred in its construction of the agreement as contemplating the agreed-upon profit percentage to be computed on the basis of the improved lands (by improved lands is meant the property and new multifamily, dwellings) rather than the unimproved lands which contained only a house, garage and dog kennel. According to appellants, if the contract was plain and unambiguous…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. TollefsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. FisherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Sipple v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Medford Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Milwaukee County v. Badger Chair & Furniture Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Joint School District No. 10 v. Jefferson Education Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Seitzinger v. Community Health NetworkWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Goebel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Zweck v. D P Way Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.