Legal Opinion

Medford Lumber Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The plaintiff Medford Lumber Company entered into a written contract with one Joseph Mahner whereby the said Mahner agreed to cut, log, and deliver in roll-ways at the railroad tracks all of the merchantable saw-log timber standing on lands described, “or other lands as may be agreed upon at a later date.” The contract prescribed the length into which the logs were to be cut and the minimum circumference at the top. It further prescribed that the logs should be decked in a good and workmanlike manner and the • maximum and minimum distance that they should be decked from the rail. The lumber…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Carleton v. Foundry & Machine Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Farmer v. St. Croix Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Harding v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. United States v. DriscollSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Moore & Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  3. Ledesma v. BergesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. FisherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API