Legal Opinion
Van Dyck Printing Co. v. Dinicola
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 11, 1993No. File No. CV 87-262631PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodgson, J.
The plaintiff, Van Dyck Printing Company, brings the present action seeking money damages from the defendant, Anthony F. DiNicola, for breach of a covenant not to compete after the termination of his employment with the plaintiff. Because the plaintiffs claim concerning the covenant at issue applied to a two year period commencing in April, 1987, the plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief has become moot.
The defendant denies breach of his employment agreement and raises as a special defense that the cov enant not to compete was unenforceable because the plaintiff had breached the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Scott v. General Iron & Welding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Bernstein v. NemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Van Dyck Printing Co. v. DiNicolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- A.H. Harris & Sons, Inc. v. NasoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Gorman v. Earmark, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Sartor v. Town of ManchesterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Weseley Software Development Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.