Legal Opinion
A.H. Harris & Sons, Inc. v. Naso
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 30, 2015No. Case No. 3:14CV304(AWT)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, A.H. Harris & Sons, Inc. (“A.H. Harris”), filed a motion for a pre*285liminary injunction, seeking, inter alia, to enjoin defendant Taralynn Naso (“Naso”) from continuing her employment with defendant [¶] Supply Construction Supply, Ltd. d/b/a White Cap Construction Supply (“White Cap”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion for a preliminary injunction is being granted.
I. FACTS
Naso was hired by A.H. Harris in 2004 as an administrative assistant in its credit department. Shortly after being hired,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Weisman v. KasparSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ashfield Health LLC v. JacobsonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Connecticut Green Bank v. PosiGen, PBC f/k/a PosiGen, Inc., Bid Administrator LLC, Bid III PosiGen Aggregator LP, BII Bid US Holdings LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Eastern Computer Exchange, Inc v. KingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Edelman Financial Engines LLC and Edelman Financial Engines, L.P. v. Prime Capital Investment Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
- Gartner, Inc. v. Hackett Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.