Legal Opinion

Van Dyck Printing Co. v. DiNicola

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 18, 1994No. 15005PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

These appeals challenge the validity of a trial court judgment awarding damages for a former employee’s breach of a one year covenant not to com*273pete that was part of a written employment contract. The plaintiff, Van Dyck Printing Company, sued the defendant, Anthony DiNicola, to recover for profits lost because the defendant, after leaving his employment with the plaintiff, joined another company to solicit business in competition with the plaintiff in violation of an express covenant not to compete.1 The defendant disputed the enforceability of the covenant not to compete and filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Refuse Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Daw's Critical Care Registry, Inc. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Van Dyck Printing Co. v. DinicolaConnecticut Superior Court · 1993
  4. Loeb v. Al-Mor Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Greater Bridgeport Transit District v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Advanced Business Systems, Inc. v. CrystalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Neiditz v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Val-Pak of Central Connecticut North, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Masotti v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API