Legal Opinion
Terzian v. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1969No. Civ. 24393PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RATTIGAN, J.
Edward J. Terzian (hereinafter “plaintiff”), the insured under an automobile policy issued by defendant insurance carrier, brought this action under the policy’s uninsured motorist coverage. He appeals from a judgment for defendant entered after nonjury trial.
Plaintiff’s policy included uninsured motorist coverage as required, and with the provisions required, by Insurance Code section 11580.2. The coverage obligated defendant to pay him, subject to a policy limit of $ 10,000, all sums which he was “legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. KowalskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Mills v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Calhoun v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co. v. WymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Borders v. Great Falls Yosemite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Terzian v. California Casualty Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.