Zager v. Setzer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnsoN, J.
Our study of the record leaves the impression that the evidence relied on by the defendant was sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the issues of rescission and damages raised by the further defense and counterclaim.
The evidence discloses that the theatre was operated by C. C. Freeman previous to its acquisition by the defendant. Freeman purchased the equipment on the installnient-payment plan from the plaintiff about 15 October, 1951, and continued operations until sometime the following spring or summer, when he gave it up and left town. A foreclosure ensued, under which the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Whitehurst v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
- Ward v. . HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Ward v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cantrell v. Woodhill Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Early v. EleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Harbach v. Lain and Keonig, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.