Legal Opinion

Harbach v. Lain and Keonig, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1985No. 834SC1194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The first error assigned by defendant appellants is the denial of their motion for summary judgment. This assignment is overruled without discussion because the record does not show what evidence, if any, was presented to the court in support of the motion. Though the motion states that it is supported by “depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions of fact, together with the affidavits attached hereto,” no such documents are in the record before us; thus we have no basis for concluding that the evidence presented established that no material issue of material fact…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Harding v. Southern Loan & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Peyton v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harton v. HartonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Douglas v. DoubCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Post & Front Properties, Ltd. v. Roanoke Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API