State v. Bauer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
The question presented in this case is whether the district court violated Minn. Stat. § 609.035 (2010) when it sentenced appellant Cody Bauer (Bauer) for both selling a controlled substance and failing to affix tax stamps to the controlled substance. Because we conclude that the crimes did not arise from the same behavioral incident, we hold that section 609.035 is not applicable, and we therefore affirm.
The facts at trial established that in May 2006 the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) and the Paul Bunyan Drug Task Force (Task Force) engaged in a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. BookwalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. ReilandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Mercer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. RushtonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Timothy John BakkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Munt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. RushtonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.