Legal Opinion

State v. Reiland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1966No. 40191PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

The question raised in this prohibition proceeding is whether, under the facts shown, the so-called double-punishment statute of our Criminal Code of 1963, Minn. St. 609.035, recently considered in State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394, 141 N. W. (2d) 517, bars a prosecution of a pending charge of criminal negligence (a felony) after defendant was convicted, sentenced, and served time in jail for the offense of driving after revocation of his driver’s license (a misdemeanor).

The few facts which are revealed by the record and defendant’s brief appear undisputed. On August 21,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Dowdy v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. State v. EmpeyUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Smith v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. BookwalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Stangvik v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Effinger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API