State v. Rushton
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, Judge:
' 1 David M. Rushton entered a conditional guilty plea to one misdemeanor and two felony offenses stemming from his failure to pay employee wages and remit retirement withholdings while he owned and operated Fooptube, LLC, a computer programming and design company. He argues that the district court should have granted his motion to dismiss the charges because they arose from the same eriminal episode as charges to which he had previously pleaded guilty. We affirm Rushton's convictions.
BACKGROUND
[2 In 2008, the Utah State Tax Commission began investigating Rushton and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SeryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MeadUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. PorterUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RushtonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. HenflingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- State v. RushtonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. RushtonUtah Supreme Court · 2017