State v. Rushton
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Himonas,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 This ease clarifies the interpretation of the phrase “single criminal objective” in the context of the mandatory joinder statute, Utah Code § 76-1-401, which prohibits the State from prosecuting a defendant in separate actions for “conduct [that] may establish separate offenses under a single criminal episode,” id. § 76-1-402(2). A “single criminal episode” is defined as “all conduct which is closely related in time and is incident to an attempt or an accomplishment of a single criminal objective.” Id. § 76-1-401 (emphasis added).
¶ 2 The…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. Martinez-CastellanosUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Bryner v. Cardon Outreach, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Rutherford v. Talisker Canyons Fin., Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
- Oliver v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.