Legal Opinion
Bankers Investment Company v. Humphrey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 6, 1962No. 39398PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Bankers Investment Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced an action in replevin against E. E. Humphrey and Mary Humphrey for the possession of a “Fairlane” automobile. The cause was submitted to the court on an agreed stipulation of facts. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants.
FACTS
It was stipulated that: on November 5, 1956, W. C. Moore, who had possession of the automobile, executed an Oklahoma Retail Installment contract in favor of Doen-ges Motors, Inc., covering the automobile in question; on the same date the above contract was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Al's Auto Sales v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Joy v. GiglioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Rogers County Bank v. CullisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Paul Hellman, Inc. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Shrier v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adams v. City National Bank &Trust Co. of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Central Natl. Bank & Trust Co. of Enid v. Community Bk. & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Volvo Commercial Finance LLC the Americas v. McClellanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- Doenges Motors, Inc. v. Bankers Investment CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Osborn v. First National Bank of HoldenvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.