Legal Opinion

Markovich v. Chambers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1993No. 91-CV-0107; CA A74254PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Plaintiffs appeal a judgment quieting title to real property in defendants. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and affirm.

Plaintiffs live on a large lot that lies south of the lot where defendants operate a store. For decades, a fence has separated the two properties. When plaintiffs bought their lot in 1977, their deed was based on a 1948 survey that showed the fence to be the property line. However, when defendants bought their lot in 1981, their deed was based on a 1981 survey that placed the property line 10 feet south of the fence. In 1986 and 1987, plaintiffs recorded lot line…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Sertic v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hopkins v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lieberfreund v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Nooteboom v. BulsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Kohler v. AlspawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Manderscheid v. DuttonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Rayburn v. CoffeltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API