Legal Opinion

Rayburn v. Coffelt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 18, 1998No. 94CV-1308CC; CA A94589PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

This action arises out of a dispute over land that adjoins both plaintiffs and defendants’ real property. Plaintiff brought suit to quiet title to the disputed land, claiming ownership of the land by adverse possession under the common law and under ORS 105.620. Plaintiff also sought to establish ownership of the land by proving a boundary by mutual agreement and acquiescence and sought damages for trespass. Defendants counterclaimed to quiet title. The trial court quieted title in plaintiff, awarded him damages for defendants’ trespass and entered judgment for plaintiff on defendants’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Brooke Et Ux v. Amuchastegui Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. McNear v. GuistinOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Whitley v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Davis v. ParkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nooteboom v. BulsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Zambrotto v. SUPERIOR LUMBER COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API