Legal Opinion

Sertic v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

In his complaint filed May 22, 1941, plaintiff Paul Sertic alleges that he is the owner in fee simple and entitled to the possession of lot 4 in section 35, township 17, south range 6 west of the "Willamette Meridian in Lane county, Oregon. Plaintiff also alleges that defendant wrongfully withholds said real property from the plaintiff to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $600.00.

Defendant’s answer was filed on September 12, 1941. The allegations in defendant’s further and separate answers will be stated here, because of the statutory provisions to the effect that in a case of this kind, the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. HumphreyOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Caufield v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Rowland v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Springer v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Anderson v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1921

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Faulconer v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Nedry v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Harty v. ByeOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. REID v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. EddyOregon Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API