Legal Opinion
Neal v. County of Stanislaus
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 1983No. Civ. 6170PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOOLPERT, J.
Plaintiff is an attorney who has successfully obtained awards of social security supplemental security income (SSI) benefits for several clients. Pending the awards, the clients had been extended interim assistance by the defendant Stanislaus County (County). Because his work resulted in the County being fully reimbursed the amounts advanced, plaintiff brought this action to compel the County to share his attorney fees. He appeals from a judgment denying the relief sought.
Plaintiff was retained to represent four SSI benefit claimants in separate administrative hearings.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Kennedy v. WollenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- French v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robinson v. City of Wichita Employees' Retirement Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Martinez v. Colorado Department of Human ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Government Employees Ins. Co. v. CapulliCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Abouab v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Kraft v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.