Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Colorado Department of Human Services

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2003No. 02CA1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge VOGT.

The issue in this case is whether Colorado may require indigent disabled persons who receive state interim assistance benefits to reimburse the state out of their federal assistance benefits without paying a share of the legal fees incurred by the disabled persons in obtaining those federal benefits. Contending that it may not, plaintiff, Chad Martinez, filed this proposed class action against defendants, Colorado Department of Human Services (DHS) and Otero County Department of Social Services. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his complaint…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. DCB Construction Co. v. Central City Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Salzman v. BachrachSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Dudding v. Norton Frickey & AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Donchez v. Coors Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Lawry v. PalmColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Kruse v. Town of Castle RockColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Marshall v. Civil Service CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Brown Group Retail, Inc. v. State & Colorado Department of TransportationColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API