Legal Opinion

County of Tulare v. City of Dinuba

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 11781PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This appeal was taken from that part of a judgment entered in the superior court of the county of Fresno, to which court the questions involved in this appeal had been transferred by the superior court of the County of Tulare for decision, wherein said superior court of the county of Fresno refused to tax as costs of suit an attorney fee in favor of W. W. Middlecoff, Esq., in the sum of $11,980.47 against the share of a fund allocated to the County of Tulare and paid into court by the defendant San Joaquin Light and Power Corporation for the use and benefit of said county, on account of an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. County of Tulare v. City of DinubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Los Angeles Trust & Saving Bank v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. County of Marin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API