Legal Opinion

Bumgarner v. Orton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1944No. Civ. A. 5696PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendants, for her own immediate occupancy as a dwelling, the possession of certain described premises in the city of Los Angeles. Defendants have been occupying said premises on a month to month tenancy since March 21, 1942. On August 20, 1943, plaintiff served defendants with a written notice terminating their tenancy on September 22, 1943, and within twenty-four hours thereafter, served a copy of said notice upon the Office of Price Administration, Rent Control Division, Los Angeles office, as required by O.P.A. Rent Regulation For Housing (8 Federal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Asnon v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Heney v. Sutro & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Docter v. FurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Waugh v. PrinceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  2. Snyder v. ReshenkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Staves v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Lester v. IsaacCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Sviggum v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API