Legal Opinion

Casselli v. Powlen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 2007PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DANIELS, J.:

BACKGROUND OF CASE

¶ 1 Appellant, Louis Casselli, tripped, stumbled and fell on a sidewalk outside of Appellee, Robert Powlen’s home. It is undisputed that Appellant broke a bone in his left foot in the fall. Neither does Appellee dispute the fact that Appellant incurred medical expenses of $1,578.00 for the treatment of that broken bone. The jury found that both Appellant and Appel-lee were each fifty percent negligent1 in causing Appellant’s fall, but, nevertheless, awarded Appellant “zero” damages. Appellant filed a motion for a new trial limited to the issue of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Majczyk v. OeschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Hawley v. DonahooSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Tudor Insurance v. Township of StoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Bostanic v. Barker-BartoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. TrinidadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Banohashim v. R.S. Enterprises, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Catlin v. HamburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Amadou, K. v. Sarver, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Anthony, M. & C. v. Rizzo, S. & L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API