Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Donahoo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 1992No. 00724PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial and/or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The sole issue raised on review is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant a new trial after the jury awarded him zero damages for his personal injuries. Finding that the trial court erred, we reverse.

On March 24, 1989, appellant, Thomas Hawley, was involved in an automobile accident with appellee, James Donahoo, near Ulster, Pennsylvania. Appellee conceded liability, and also conceded that appellant suffered a compression fracture of the L-3…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Todd v. BerciniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Holland v. ZelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Thompson v. IannuzziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Nudelman v. GilbrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Daniel v. William R. Drach Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Kruczkowska v. WinterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API