Legal Opinion

Tudor Insurance v. Township of Stowe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1997No. 492PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge.

Appellant Stowe Township (“Stowe”) claims trial court error in refusing to enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict or to order a new trial following a jury’s determination that Stowe acted in bad faith when it falsely answered questions on an insurance application. Finding that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury on Tudor’s burden of proof, we are constrained to remand for a new trial.

We are aware of our deferential standard when reviewing a trial court’s decision to grant or deny a new trial: the power to grant or deny a new trial lies inherently with the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. D'Auria v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Lewis v. MellorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Thatcher's Drug Store of West Goshen, Inc. v. Consolidated Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rohm & Haas Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance v. FojaniniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Nigra v. WalshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API