Legal Opinion
Kers & Co. v. ATC Communications Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 24, 1998No. 97-1222-JTMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
The present action arises from a stock option agreement granted by defendant ATC as compensation for the efforts of the late Bobby Vickers, who had helped in establishing ATC’s business. At Vickers’s request, the option was actually given to the plaintiff KERS & Company, a partnership which holds the title to securities on behalf of trusts established by Vickers. Vickers died in 1995. KERS alleges here that ATC violated the provisions of the stock option agreement by failing, following receipt of a notice that KERS was exercising the option, to register…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Mark Scully v. Us Wats, Inc. Kevin O'hare, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Us Wats Aaron Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Us Wats Stephen Parker, Individually and in His Capacity as Executive Vice-President of Us WatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Scully v. US Wats, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Farmer v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.