Legal Opinion

Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 25, 1997No. 51, 1997PublishedCited by 369 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we focus on the correctness of the grant of summary judgment in a contract dispute over the interpretation of an indemnification provision. In granting summary judgment, the Court of Chancery found the contract provision to be unambiguous. We disagree and hold that the indemnification provision is ambiguous, thus raising factual issues requiring consideration of extrinsic evidence to determine the intended meaning of the provision in light of the expectations of the contracting parties. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Chancery and remand the ease…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Pellaton v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  4. Klair v. ReeseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  5. State v. Interstate Amiesite CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by369 opinions

  1. GMG Capital Investments, LLC v. Athenian Venture Partners ISupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. Allied Capital Corp. v. GC-Sun Holdings, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
  4. Salamone v. GormanSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. United Rentals, Inc. v. RAM Holdings, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007

364 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API