Overby v. Oklahoma City
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter •referred to as the defendant, was by complaint filed in the municipal court of Oklahoma City charged with the violation of a city ordinance by maintaining a nuisance by operating a mechanical device known as a slot machine. The defendant was convicted, and appealed from the municipal court to the county court of Oklahoma county, tried and convicted, and Ms punishment fixed at a fine of $19 and cost. Motion for new trial was filed, considered, overruled, and exceptions saved, and the defendant has appealed to this court.
The ordinance upon which the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WoodmanMontana Supreme Court · 1902
- Nelson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- Ex Parte FullerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Ex Parte OverbyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davies v. Mills Novelty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Kirk v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Mills Novelty Co. v. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- The PEOPLE v. One Mechanical DeviceIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- McNeice v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.