Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Fuller
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 1, 1925No. A-5668PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. The petition in error alleges petitioner was convicted before a justice of the peace of Oklahoma City on a charge of operating a vending and weighing machine, fined the sum of $25, and committed to the sheriff of Oklahoma county until such fine should be paid; that the prosecution on which the petitioner was convicted is based on section 3, c. 162, of the Session Laws of Oklahoma 1925; and that said act is unconstitutional, illegal, and void.
Chapter 162, Session Laws 1925, provides that every machine operated in a public place for the vending…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- State Ex Rel. Short v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- In Re AmblerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Ex Parte HunnicuttCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Leach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Overby v. Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Simpkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- MacKay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Meek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
- SIERRA CLUB v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSIONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.