The PEOPLE v. One Mechanical Device
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily
The circuit court of Rock Island County, upon a petition filed by the State’s Attorney, found that a mechanical device commonly referred to as a pinball machine was a gambling device and ordered its destruction. On appeal by the legal owners the Appellate Court for the Second District affirmed the finding and order; we, in turn, have granted a petition for leave to appeal in order to review the interpretation placed upon the controlling statute by the courts below.
The statute in question, herein called the Gambling Device Act was enacted for the stated purpose of prohibiting the use of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bobel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Frost v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Wigton's ReturnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shoot v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Ratley v. BatchelorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- People v. One MacHine Known As" Circus Days"Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Phillips v. Double Down Interactive LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.