Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. One Mechanical Device

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1957No. 34029PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daily

The circuit court of Rock Island County, upon a petition filed by the State’s Attorney, found that a mechanical device commonly referred to as a pinball machine was a gambling device and ordered its destruction. On appeal by the legal owners the Appellate Court for the Second District affirmed the finding and order; we, in turn, have granted a petition for leave to appeal in order to review the interpretation placed upon the controlling statute by the courts below.

The statute in question, herein called the Gambling Device Act was enacted for the stated purpose of prohibiting the use of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bobel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Frost v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  5. Wigton's ReturnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shoot v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Ratley v. BatchelorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. People v. One MacHine Known As" Circus Days"Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Phillips v. Double Down Interactive LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API