Legal Opinion
McNeice v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 1957No. 37,026PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that the type of pinball machine which the plaintiff had been maintaining on his premises did not constitute a gambling device or a lottery within the meaning of M. S. A. 614.01, 614.06, and 614.07. The judgment of the trial court also enjoined the city of Minneapolis and all of its officers and agents from enforcing the order of the city’s superintendent of police to confiscate all pinball machines which were designed to give free plays to a player attaining a certain score. This order had been issued in accordance with an opinion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- United States v. KorpanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
- Wigton's ReturnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Peachey v. Boswell, MayorIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- Shoot v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Pitman Farms v. Kuehl Poultry, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Patrick Hammer Fay, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.