Mills Novelty Co. v. Farrell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellee sued to restrain the appellant from seizing and destroying its vending machines known as the “Mills Non-Convertible Vender,” used for the sale of its mints, and from arresting the possessors of such machines. The theory of the suit is that the ap-pellee’s business, which is of large-proportions, is arbitrarily and wrongfully interfered with by the police officers acting under appellant’s directions. The right of seizure and arrest is claimed because it is said the machines are gambling devices prohibited by sections 6318, 6324, and 6325 of the General Statutes of Connecticut (1980).
Se…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ashcraft v. HealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Davies v. Mills Novelty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Washington Coin MacH. Ass'n v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- State v. One "Jack and Jill" PinballMissouri Court of Appeals · 1949
- The PEOPLE v. One Mechanical DeviceIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.