Public Utilities Commission v. Natatorium Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Public Utilities Commission, in which the commission held that the Natatorium Company was a public utility, as to its sale of the use of hot water to certain inhabitants of Boise City for heating and domestic purposes.
From the record it appears that in 1890, EL B. Eastman, Timothy Regan, W. H. Ridenbaugh and J. W. Cunningham acquired an option to purchase the SE. % of the SE. 14 of the SW.14 of section 12, T. 3 N., R. 2 E., B. M., in Ada county, adjoining Boise City on the east, from Robert Wilson, and, due to certain surface indications, began…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Yeo v. TweedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- Baker v. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Binning v. Miller, Water Division SuperintendentWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
- Hall v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.