Legal Opinion

Hall v. Taylor

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1937No. 6426PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

This action was commenced by respondent to quiet his title to the waters of a small spring or seep situated on appellants’ land, and he alleged title to such waters by adverse possession and use. The court made findings and entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff (respondent here) and the defendants appealed.

The assignments of error involve the sufficiency of evidence to sustain the findings, and particularly to establish title to the waters of the spring in question, either by adverse possession or by diversion and appropriation. The essential part of the court’s decree reads as follows:

“I…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bassett v. SwensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Boynton v. LongleyNevada Supreme Court · 1885
  3. King v. ChamberlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Marshall v. Niagara Springs Orchard Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Washington County Irrigation District v. TalboyIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gibbens v. WeisshauptIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Checketts v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Loosli v. HesemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Argosy Trust Ex Rel. Its Trustee v. WiningerIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API