Legal Opinion
Kitzman v. Newman
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1964No. Civ. 27233PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment awarding damages to the plaintiffs. The defendants’ building was on land adjoining that of the plaintiffs on Ventura Boulevard in the Encino section of the City of Los Angeles. The defendants extended their building across a sidewalk theretofore used by the public and thereby obstructed the view of the front of plaintiffs’ building by persons proceeding along Ventura Boulevard in an easterly direction.
The defendants have elected to present their appeal on a settled statement pursuant to rule 7(a) of the California Rules of Court.
At the place…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Johndrow v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Kelbro, Inc. v. MyrickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
- Williams v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Friends of H Street v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Kempton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Simpson Redwood Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Martin v. City of CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Simpson Redwood Co. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.