Legal Opinion
Kempton v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 2008No. B201128PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Kimberly Kempton and Charles Kinney appeal from a judgment issued following the grant of a motion for judgment on the pleadings without leave to amend. They claim that their complaint was either sufficient to allege a cause of action for nuisance against the City of Los Angeles or, if not, that they should have been granted leave to amend. We reverse the judgment with directions to grant leave to amend the complaint to allege a cause of action for nuisance.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
Appellants own a home on Femwood Avenue in Los Angeles. The garage at the residence has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Stockett v. Association of California Water Agencies Joint Powers Insurance AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Campbell v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Satyadi v. West Contra Costa Healthcare DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Leonard v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Connelly v. Bornstein, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.