Query v. Gate City Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
It is asserted tbat tbe court erred in two respects, (1) in refusing to set aside tbe verdict as against tbe weight of tbe evidence, and (2) in signing tbe judgment.
First. Speaking to tbe action of tbe trial court in refusing to enter judgment on a verdict wbicb tbe court bad theretofore set aside, in its discretion, as contrary to tbe weight of tbe evidence, it was said in Goodman v. Goodman, 201 N. C., 808, 161 S. E., 686: “Rulings of tbe Superior Court on matters addressed to tbe court’s discretion, e.g., . . . determination of motion at trial term to set aside verdict as contrary to tbe…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Dixon v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Wilson v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Likas v. LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Likas v. . LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Lea v. . BridgemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.