Legal Opinion

Lea v. . Bridgeman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1948PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

The only exceptions of the appellants are their- exceptions to the judgment. They took such exceptions in the court below'upon the express ground that the trial court erred in rendering the judgment because there was no evidence adduced on the trial sufficient to sustain ’the affirmative answers of the jury to the issues submitted. .

The appellants failed to challenge the sufficiency of the testimony to support the verdict by a motion for nonsuit, or by a prayer for instruction, or by an objection to the submission of the issues. Holder v. Lumber Co., 161 N. C., 117, 76 S. E., 4-85; Burcham v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Query v. Gate City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Morrisett v. Elizabeth City Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Hardee v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API