Legal Opinion

Wilson v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkogdeN, J.

It is elementary law that upon appeal to the Supreme Court the appellant must show error. Moreover, this Court can only review such questions as are presented by exceptions duly taken and assignments of error duly made. Thus, in Bakery Co. v. Ins. Co., 201 N. C., 816, it was beld that “this Court will consider and pass upon only exceptions duly noted by the appellant to decisions of the court below on matters of law or legal inference. ... It has no jurisdiction except to review, upon appeal, decisions of the court below on matters of law or legal inference. It can exercise this jurisdiction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. . Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Hughes v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Query v. Gate City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API