Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Juan Munoz and Maria Munoz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1964No. 18760_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by Union Pacific Railroad Company from a judgment in favor of appellees for personal injuries in a diversity action. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a) (1).

The sole question on appeal is whether the jury should have been instructed on the doctrine of last clear chance. It was instructed as follows:

“A certain reasoning process that we sometimes call to our aid in analyzing the facts of an accident case is known as the Doctrine of Last Clear Chance. It is permissible to use the doctrine only after we first find, and you may not use it unless and until you first shall…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API