Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 12, 2012No. SACV 11-1987 DOC (RNBx)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) filed by Defendant Allstate. (Dkt. 6). The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local R. 7-15. After considering the moving, opposing, and replying papers, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Motion.
The Court DENIES the Motion regarding the Complaint’s fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims because: (1) Defendant is incorrect in arguing that the Complaint’s negligent…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Bly-Magee v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McVicar v. Goodman Global, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Maeda v. Pinnacle Foods Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
- Green v. Central Mortgage Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Gilmore v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- McNamara v. PickenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.