Legal Opinion

Maeda v. Pinnacle Foods Inc.

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 9, 2019No. CIVIL NO. 18-00459 JAO-RLPPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCUSSION

Defendant seeks dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice on the following grounds: (1) the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the claims asserted by Plaintiff Iliana Sanchez; (2) Plaintiffs' consumer protection claims fail because Plaintiffs have not alleged an actionable misrepresentation; (3) Plaintiffs' common law claims fail as a matter of law; and (4) Plaintiffs lack standing to seek prospective injunctive relief. The Court addresses each of Defendant's arguments in turn.

A. Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Plaintiff Iliana Sanchez and Unnamed Nonresident Class Members

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Garland v. The Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  2. Gentry Homes, Ltd. v. Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
  3. Gilman v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  4. Greys Avenue Partners, LLC v. CoupeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
  5. Greys Avenue Partners, LLC v. CoupeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API