Legal Opinion
McNamara v. Picken
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1051PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are two post-trial motions: (1) plaintiff/counter-defendant’s motion for a new trial as to the fraudulent misrepresentation and promissory fraud claims (Aug. 15, 2013 [ECF No. 163] (“New Trial Mot.”)); and (2) plaintiff/counter-defendant’s motion for a new trial or, in the alternative, for remittitur. (Aug. 15, 2013 [ECF No. 164] (“Remittitur Mot.”).)
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Scott A. McNamara, M.D., filed suit against Catherine A. Picken, M.D., and the Washington ENT Group PLLC (“WENT”) for an accounting, conversion, breach of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burns v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Gopher Media LLC v. MeloneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023