Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1988No. 16PA88PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

Plaintiffs filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment concerning the validity of a rezoning amendment adopted by the Durham City Council (hereinafter “the Council”), which rezoned approximately 12.9 acres of land near the intersection of Roxboro and Latta Roads in Durham, North Carolina. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that the rezoning was invalid because (1) the property was rezoned on a vote of 7 to 6 of the Council when a valid protest petition, filed pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160A-385 on behalf of the residents of the neighborhood near the rezoned property, made a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Allred v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Chrismon v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Marren v. GambleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Finch v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Kerik v. Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Musi v. Town of ShallotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Massey v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API