Legal Opinion

Chrismon v. Guilford County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 28, 1988No. 232PA87PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

This was an action by plaintiffs for a declaratory judgment with regard to an amendment to the Guilford County, North Carolina, zoning ordinance. Specifically, plaintiffs sought a judgment declaring that the amendment to the ordinance adopted 20 December 1982 rezoning defendant Bruce Clapp’s 8.57 acres of land was unlawful and therefore void. The principal issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error in affirming the validity of the rezoning in question. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding, first, that the rezoning in question…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Collard v. Incorporated Village of Flower HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Lanvale Properties, LLC v. County of CabarrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Village Creek Property Owners' Ass'n v. Town of EdentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API