Legal Opinion

Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. v. Keith

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1966No. 7759PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

This action was commenced as one to foreclose materialmen’s liens in connection with the construction of the Keith home,’ but by cross-complaint Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. (hereafter termed I.E.H.) sought foreclosure of a note and mortgage executed by the Keiths and allegedly given to I.E.H. to finance the house. The material liens are not now an issue. I.E.H. has appealed from a summary judgment dismissing its cross-complaint. This appeal, therefore, turns on whether the pleadings, answers to interrogatories and affidavits present a genuine issue of fact requiring…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grue v. HensleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Srader v. Pecos Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sooner Pipe & Supply Corp. v. DoerrieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Ginn v. MacAlusoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hubbard v. MathisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. First National Bank Ex Rel. Huckleby v. Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Jelso v. World Balloon Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Martin v. Board of Education of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Johnson v. J. S. & H. Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API