Hubbard v. Mathis
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NOBLE, Justice.
The single question presented by this appeal is whether, giving the plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences to be drawn from the pleadings, depositions and affidavit, and resolving all doubts as to the existence of a fact issue against the defendants, summary judgment was properly issued in defendants’ favor.
The pleadings, depositions and affidavit of plaintiff show that an oral contract was entered into in 1956 between plaintiff and Mathis, representing the defendants, by which plaintiff agreed to move from Roswell, New Mexico to Farmington, New Mexico to act as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Andrews v. AikensIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Mark Whelan v. New Mexico Western Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Srader v. Pecos Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Paulos v. JanetakosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Sooner Pipe & Supply Corp. v. DoerrieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- General Electric Credit Corporation v. TidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Martin v. Board of Education of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. v. KeithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Simon v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.