Legal Opinion

Martin v. Board of Education of City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1968No. 8455PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOBLE, Justice.

Roy Martin and his wife, Frances, sued the Board of Education of the City of Albuquerque (hereafter termed Board of Education), the City of Albuquerque (hereafter termed City), and Gordon Herkenhoff & Associates, Inc. (hereafter termed Herkenhoff), seeking to recover because of damage to plaintiffs’ home by flood following a heavy rain. Summary judgments were rendered in favor of the Board of Education and Herkenhoff. Pursuant to Rule 54(b) (§ 21-1-1(54) (b), N.M.S.A. 1953), these summary judgments were specifically made final to permit appeal. The action against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Union Gas Co. v. Briner Rust Proofing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Pederson v. LothmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. v. KeithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Wieneke v. ChalmersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ballard v. MarkeyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Brock Ex Rel. Estate of BrockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. C & H Construction & Paving Co. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Kelly v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Harless v. EwingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Spears v. Canon De Carnue Land GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API