Legal Opinion
MacMillan, Inc. v. Federal Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1990No. 90 Civ. 0438 (RPP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
This diversity case involves a claim under a Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance Policy (the “Policy”). Defendant Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss plaintiff Macmillan’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
I. Facts
For purposes of this motion to dismiss, the Court assumes the truth of the allegations in the complaint, which may be summarized as follows. On about October 6, 1987, Federal issued an Officers’ and Directors’ Insurance Policy to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Francis J. Dwyer v. Edward v. Regan, Individually and as Trustee and Administrative Head of the New York State Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ameriwood Industries International Corp. v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
- Wallace v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Fusco v. Rome Cable Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- MacMillan, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Macmillan, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992