Legal Opinion
Fusco v. Rome Cable Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 4, 1994No. 5:92-cv-01181PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, Senior District Judge.
BACKGROUND
For a number of years the defendant Rome Cable Corporation (“Rome Cable”) es tablished and maintained a Retirement Plan (“the Plan”) for its employees. Sometime in 1982 Rome Cable began experiencing severe financial difficulties. Due to continuing financial woes, on approximately July 13,1987, Rome Cable issued a formal Notice of Intent to Terminate the Plan under the “distress termination” provisions of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1341 (West Supp.1994). Effective September 14, 1987, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Tonawanda Band of Seneca IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
- Fourth Branch Associates v. Mohawk Paper Mills, Inc. (In Re Kings Falls Power Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Bath Petroleum Storage, Inc. v. SovasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- I.E.C. ex rel J.R. v. Minneapolis Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.